Discussion:
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury Road,' citing feminist agenda
(too old to reply)
Dr. Jai Maharaj
2015-05-16 18:29:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury
Road,' citing feminist agenda

Friday, May 15, 2015

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/entertainment/mad-max-fury-road-boycott-mens-rights-thr-feat/

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Men's Rights
2015-05-16 20:44:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury Road,'
citing feminist agenda
Friday, May 15, 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/entertainment/mad-max-fury-road-boycott-mens-rights-thr-feat/
The article is right. Return of Kings is another useless troll site,
but it is also a counter insurgent feminist site, like AVFM and MGTOW -
if it is not affiliated - run by computer nerds. Most of them are.

One of the aims of faux MRAs is to keep resetting the MRM to make it
immobile and useless. To do that it keeps taking issues back to the
early feminist triumph known as "the 50s" (when the first generation of
pussy family men emerged as the helpless domesticated wimps who were
pressured into slaving and supporting rebellious spoiled wives and
teenage daughters - and, we've been stuck with that subservient model of
"manhood" ever since), style issues, and all things consumerist.

The real issues are never touched. It's always the movie, the product,
"the media" or the simple controversy for the sake of generating ad
revenue. As the article itself points out, men get sucked in by the
image and style issues like explosions - but those are out of date and
have nothing to do with a man's rights relative to a woman's.

The sheer fact that whoever wrote this pig ass ignorant article
blatantly identified fire tornadoes and explosions with some official
sense of manhood shows how completely lost and out of touch with today's
reality he (or she) is. What is so laughable about it is the idea that
even if it was written by a legitimate dissenting gamergating middle
class male who honestly objects to his territory being encroached on by
females, these are only fantasy territories. They're only fighting
about movies and video games.

Whenever the day comes that one of these spoiled brats falls victim to
some rapacious divorce or a bogus DV call, he finally wakes up, but only
enough to whine about the government apparatus involved. They see the
issue as being that their families are special and should therefore have
special immunity from the law. So, they join the "i h8 big government -
stop the NWO from taxing our toys away!" movement and subvert and
bastardize terms like feminist and MRA as they continue to miss every point.

That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about female
encroachment and authority roles, but those are always missing the point
too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary statist cop/family man
who couldn't have given a shit about justice for anyone except him and
his own - even though it was his duty to do so - just like reality. He
was a babyfaced asshole who went vigilante because his stupid fucking
wife and newborn were killed (as payback) by an anarchist gang while he
wasn't there to protect her slut ass. The movie is his transformation
into Charles Bronson due to the fact that his own were hurt by the
unspoken class war that really drives Western society. It is a pro
capitalist cold war movie from 1979.

So Mad Max is far more about the statist thugs for the rich maintaining
their dominance over the "animalistic" poor than anything remotely about
men's rights. It reflects traditional statist roles for men (as
righteous thugs for family and neighborhood), but that is intentionally
misleading because those agendas have always been islands unto
themselves and don't get involved in any real causes for anything -
including men's rights. Contrary to the corporate media formula, labor
and government unions have never been genuine leftist movements and
genuine socialists have never had any luck wooing them. And as usual,
it is capitalist Hollywood that is shoving women's roles down male thug
throats, not leftists, which should be another earth shaker to the
morons who keep framing this as a left-right paradigm. But they won't
acknowledge the simple glaring truth because they are completely
addicted to the corruption.
--
They bought it. They own it.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Manimus Maximus
2015-05-17 07:13:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Men's Rights
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury Road,'
citing feminist agenda
Friday, May 15, 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/entertainment/mad-max-fury-road-boycott-mens-rights-thr-feat/
The article is right. Return of Kings is another useless troll site,
but it is also a counter insurgent feminist site, like AVFM and
MGTOW - if it is not affiliated - run by computer nerds. Most of
them are.
One of the aims of faux MRAs is to keep resetting the MRM to make it
immobile and useless. To do that it keeps taking issues back to the
early feminist triumph known as "the 50s" (when the first generation
of pussy family men emerged as the helpless domesticated wimps who
were pressured into slaving and supporting rebellious spoiled wives
and teenage daughters - and, we've been stuck with that subservient
model of "manhood" ever since), style issues, and all things
consumerist.
The real issues are never touched. It's always the movie, the
product, "the media" or the simple controversy for the sake of
generating ad revenue. As the article itself points out, men get
sucked in by the image and style issues like explosions - but those
are out of date and have nothing to do with a man's rights relative
to a woman's.
The sheer fact that whoever wrote this pig ass ignorant article
blatantly identified fire tornadoes and explosions with some official
sense of manhood shows how completely lost and out of touch with
today's reality he (or she) is. What is so laughable about it is the
idea that even if it was written by a legitimate dissenting
gamergating middle class male who honestly objects to his territory
being encroached on by females, these are only fantasy territories.
They're only fighting about movies and video games.
Whenever the day comes that one of these spoiled brats falls victim
to some rapacious divorce or a bogus DV call, he finally wakes up,
but only enough to whine about the government apparatus involved.
They see the issue as being that their families are special and
should therefore have special immunity from the law. So, they join
the "i h8 big government - stop the NWO from taxing our toys away!"
movement and subvert and bastardize terms like feminist and MRA as
they continue to miss every point.
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about
female encroachment and authority roles, but those are always missing
the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary statist
cop/family man who couldn't have given a shit about justice for
anyone except him and his own - even though it was his duty to do so
- just like reality. He was a babyfaced asshole who went vigilante
because his stupid fucking wife and newborn were killed (as payback)
by an anarchist gang while he wasn't there to protect her slut ass.
The movie is his transformation into Charles Bronson due to the fact
that his own were hurt by the unspoken class war that really drives
Western society. It is a pro capitalist cold war movie from 1979.
So Mad Max is far more about the statist thugs for the rich
maintaining their dominance over the "animalistic" poor than anything
remotely about men's rights. It reflects traditional statist roles
for men (as righteous thugs for family and neighborhood), but that is
intentionally misleading because those agendas have always been
islands unto themselves and don't get involved in any real causes for
anything - including men's rights. Contrary to the corporate media
formula, labor and government unions have never been genuine leftist
movements and genuine socialists have never had any luck wooing them.
And as usual, it is capitalist Hollywood that is shoving women's
roles down male thug throats, not leftists, which should be another
earth shaker to the morons who keep framing this as a left-right
paradigm. But they won't acknowledge the simple glaring truth
because they are completely addicted to the corruption.
Really excellent post, Men's Rights. Most of those "anti-feminist"
junksites don't state even the most basic principles of the men's
movement, and while they fart and moan about feminism and leftism they
leave out the inevitable analysis that should accompany that particular
worldview because they are all still labor movement based. It's pretty
damn stupid to make blaming Marxism your holy grail when your own bread
and butter comes from soft socialism labor pandering - under new labels
- yet we see it all of the time.

Then, when it comes to their traditional copouts against supporting
equal rights (for men) the best they can cite is a movie hero? And
their big contribution there is just a boycott because they're losing
ground there too! Even if their boycott rallies a yawn or two (to help
promote the movie), who needs these cosplaying needledicks?
--
Manimus Maximus











--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Men's Rights
2015-05-17 23:52:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Manimus Maximus
Post by Men's Rights
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury Road,'
citing feminist agenda
Friday, May 15, 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/entertainment/mad-max-fury-road-boycott-mens-rights-thr-feat/
The article is right. Return of Kings is another useless troll
site, but it is also a counter insurgent feminist site, like AVFM
and MGTOW - if it is not affiliated - run by computer nerds. Most
of them are.
One of the aims of faux MRAs is to keep resetting the MRM to make
it immobile and useless. To do that it keeps taking issues back to
the early feminist triumph known as "the 50s" (when the first
generation of pussy family men emerged as the helpless domesticated
wimps who were pressured into slaving and supporting rebellious
spoiled wives and teenage daughters - and, we've been stuck with
that subservient model of "manhood" ever since), style issues, and
all things consumerist.
The real issues are never touched. It's always the movie, the
product, "the media" or the simple controversy for the sake of
generating ad revenue. As the article itself points out, men get
sucked in by the image and style issues like explosions - but
those are out of date and have nothing to do with a man's rights
relative to a woman's.
The sheer fact that whoever wrote this pig ass ignorant article
blatantly identified fire tornadoes and explosions with some
official sense of manhood shows how completely lost and out of
touch with today's reality he (or she) is. What is so laughable
about it is the idea that even if it was written by a legitimate
dissenting gamergating middle class male who honestly objects to
his territory being encroached on by females, these are only
fantasy territories. They're only fighting about movies and video
games.
Whenever the day comes that one of these spoiled brats falls
victim to some rapacious divorce or a bogus DV call, he finally
wakes up, but only enough to whine about the government apparatus
involved. They see the issue as being that their families are
special and should therefore have special immunity from the law.
So, they join the "i h8 big government - stop the NWO from taxing
our toys away!" movement and subvert and bastardize terms like
feminist and MRA as they continue to miss every point.
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about
female encroachment and authority roles, but those are always
missing the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary
statist cop/family man who couldn't have given a shit about justice
for anyone except him and his own - even though it was his duty to
do so - just like reality. He was a babyfaced asshole who went
vigilante because his stupid fucking wife and newborn were killed
(as payback) by an anarchist gang while he wasn't there to protect
her slut ass. The movie is his transformation into Charles Bronson
due to the fact that his own were hurt by the unspoken class war
that really drives Western society. It is a pro capitalist cold
war movie from 1979.
So Mad Max is far more about the statist thugs for the rich
maintaining their dominance over the "animalistic" poor than
anything remotely about men's rights. It reflects traditional
statist roles for men (as righteous thugs for family and
neighborhood), but that is intentionally misleading because those
agendas have always been islands unto themselves and don't get
involved in any real causes for anything - including men's rights.
Contrary to the corporate media formula, labor and government
unions have never been genuine leftist movements and genuine
socialists have never had any luck wooing them. And as usual, it is
capitalist Hollywood that is shoving women's roles down male thug
throats, not leftists, which should be another earth shaker to the
morons who keep framing this as a left-right paradigm. But they
won't acknowledge the simple glaring truth because they are
completely addicted to the corruption.
Really excellent post, Men's Rights. Most of those "anti-feminist"
junksites don't state even the most basic principles of the men's
movement, and while they fart and moan about feminism and leftism
they leave out the inevitable analysis that should accompany that
particular worldview because they are all still labor movement based.
It's pretty damn stupid to make blaming Marxism your holy grail when
your own bread and butter comes from soft socialism labor pandering -
under new labels - yet we see it all of the time.
Thanks, Manimus. I've been looking through the childish Paul Elam
network for some time and I simply gave up trying to find any real
stream of ideological thought - pro-male or otherwise - going through
any of the aimless whining about "feminists". They're just low brow
tantrums protesting the pop culture for fuck's sake. Nothing to help
men get a fair shake. Paul Elam is obviously someone who got beat up a
lot as a kid and never manned up beyond having his mommy and daddy buy
him boyish things in a fruitless (yet fruity) attempt to avert the shame.
Post by Manimus Maximus
Then, when it comes to their traditional copouts against supporting
equal rights (for men) the best they can cite is a movie hero? And
their big contribution there is just a boycott because they're losing
ground there too! Even if their boycott rallies a yawn or two (to
help promote the movie), who needs these cosplaying needledicks?
That's all that it will do. This review is a shill to attract more
female movie goers, and the more that the little joystick pussies whine
about the superficialities the more the cunts are going to enjoy buying
their tickets to ruin it. It's not really a feminist takeover, it's
corporate marketing. In that respect, a genuine boycott call would be a
good idea, but they would need to get comfortable with the idea of
frequent boycotts until the producers start feeling their power. Even
if successful, a single boycott of a single movie wouldn't do diddley.
They would need to boycott not just an entire franchise but an entire
industry - or more - and the industries know that they don't have it in
them. This is fake on multiple levels.
--
They bought it. They own it.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
David Johnston
2015-05-17 20:48:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about female
encroachment and authority roles, but those are always missing the point
too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary statist cop/family man
who couldn't have given a shit about justice for anyone except him and
his own - even though it was his duty to do so - just like reality. He
was a babyfaced asshole who went vigilante because his stupid fucking
wife and newborn were killed (as payback) by an anarchist gang while he
wasn't there to protect her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
&
2015-05-18 03:20:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Johnston
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about
female encroachment and authority roles, but those are always
missing the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary
statist cop/family man who couldn't have given a shit about justice
for anyone except him and his own - even though it was his duty to
do so - just like reality. He was a babyfaced asshole who went
vigilante because his stupid fucking wife and newborn were killed
(as payback) by an anarchist gang while he wasn't there to protect
her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
do you have a point
David Johnston
2015-06-01 19:29:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations about
female encroachment and authority roles, but those are always
missing the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just an ordinary
statist cop/family man who couldn't have given a shit about justice
for anyone except him and his own - even though it was his duty to
do so - just like reality. He was a babyfaced asshole who went
vigilante because his stupid fucking wife and newborn were killed
(as payback) by an anarchist gang while he wasn't there to protect
her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
do you have a point
Nope. I was just reacting to that amount of hostility to a woman just
for being a woman.
&
2015-06-01 20:35:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Johnston
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations
about female encroachment and authority roles, but those are
always missing the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just
an ordinary statist cop/family man who couldn't have given a
shit about justice for anyone except him and his own - even
though it was his duty to do so - just like reality. He was a
babyfaced asshole who went vigilante because his stupid fucking
wife and newborn were killed (as payback) by an anarchist gang
while he wasn't there to protect her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
do you have a point
Nope. I was just reacting to that amount of hostility to a woman
just for invading mens past times.
life is so hard when you cant get way all of time . im right
--
i am & .
David Johnston
2015-06-02 22:08:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in observations
about female encroachment and authority roles, but those are
always missing the point too. Case in point, Mad Max was just
an ordinary statist cop/family man who couldn't have given a
shit about justice for anyone except him and his own - even
though it was his duty to do so - just like reality. He was a
babyfaced asshole who went vigilante because his stupid fucking
wife and newborn were killed (as payback) by an anarchist gang
while he wasn't there to protect her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
do you have a point
Nope. I was just reacting to that amount of hostility to a woman
just forbeing a woman.
invading mens past times.
Post by &
life is so hard when you cant get way all of time . im right
Thank you for your dishonest and incoherent blabbering.
&
2015-06-03 00:21:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Johnston
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by &
Post by David Johnston
Post by Men's Rights
That isn't to say that there isn't validity in
observations about female encroachment and authority roles,
but those are always missing the point too. Case in point,
Mad Max was just an ordinary statist cop/family man who
couldn't have given a shit about justice for anyone except
him and his own - even though it was his duty to do so -
just like reality. He was a babyfaced asshole who went
vigilante because his stupid fucking wife and newborn were
killed (as payback) by an anarchist gang while he wasn't
there to protect her slut ass.
Wow. You really hate women.
do you have a point
Nope. I was just reacting to that amount of hostility to a
woman just forbeing a woman.
invading mens past times.
Post by &
life is so hard when you cant get way all of time . im right
Thank you for your dishonest and incoherent blabbering.
you would know . i win
--
i am & the great .
Jewels
2015-05-18 22:15:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Dr. Jai Maharaj
Men's rights activists call for boycott of 'Mad Max: Fury
Road,' citing feminist agenda
Friday, May 15, 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/15/entertainment/mad-max-fury-road-boycott-mens-rights-thr-feat/
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
This article is utterly lame. I mean really! women have been sex objects from time immortal. They have been used, undermined,oppressed, suppressed, depressed, and have had the eternal misfortune of being the lowest paid between the sexes and despite having higher grades of achievement. Please don't get me wrong, but chauvinism and feminism are on the same exact monotonous coin. This person is either very insecure about his own manhood, or is a total chauvinist, hating women who are finally making a little bit of cash through double the work.
Loading...